DEVOTION
ROMANS
WHAT
IF OR WHAT THEN
Rom
9:22-33
22
What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with
great patience the objects of his wrath — prepared for destruction? 23 What if
he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy,
whom he prepared in advance for glory— 24 even us, whom he also called, not
only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles? 25 As he says in Hosea:
"I
will call them 'my people' who are not my people; and I will call her 'my loved
one' who is not my loved one," 26
and, "It will happen that in the very place where it was said to them, 'You
are not my people,' they will be called 'sons of the living God.'"
27
Isaiah cries out concerning Israel: "Though the number of the Israelites
be like the sand by the sea, only the remnant will be saved. 28 For the Lord
will carry out his sentence on earth with speed and finality." 29 It is just as Isaiah said previously: "Unless
the Lord Almighty had left us descendants, we would have become like Sodom, we
would have been like Gomorrah."
30
What then shall we say? That the Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness,
have obtained it, a righteousness that is by faith; 31 but Israel, who pursued
a law of righteousness, has not attained it. 32 Why not? Because they pursued
it not by faith but as if it were by works. They stumbled over the
"stumbling stone." 33 As it is written: "See, I lay in Zion a
stone that causes men to stumble and a rock that makes them fall, and the one
who trusts in him will never be put to shame."
NIV
So
often people want to read this as God does choose some people to show his wrath
to and they are prepared for destruction. Some people make this to mean that
God chooses who he will save and who he will not. But this whole dissertation
starts out with “What if God”. The point starts with “What then shall we say?”
All that he said from the “What if God” to the “What then shall we say?” is a “What
if” and if is not the “What is”. God does not choose who his objects of wrath
are and who his objects of mercy are. When we get to the point, he makes it
clear Israel was his chosen people, however that does not mean the gentiles are
objects of wrath. What is being said is that a person becomes the object of
mercy through faith in Jesus Christ. Whosoever pursues righteousness will find
it through faith. Although Israel is God’s chosen people, they have not received
mercy, but have received wrath because they pursued righteousness through the
law. The gentiles who did not have the law, pursued righteousness through
faith. The whole “What if” scenario was to bring to the truth that God desires
all men be saved through faith in Jesus Christ and not by some set of laws or
rules or bylaws, or denominationalism, or lists of do’s and don’ts, but by
faith. Because it is by faith, then whosoever believes will not perish, will
not become the object of his wrath. People who choose to refuse to believe,
although they have the opportunity to believe and be saved, will be the objects
of his wrath. It is not by God’s choosing who will be shown mercy or wrath, but
by man’s choice. Even if we go back to the idea that God will show mercy on who
he wants to have mercy and harden who he wants to harden, does not mean the
opposite of what was just say about righteousness. God did not choose to harden
Israel’s heart and decide to have mercy of the gentiles. Although he raised
Pharaoh with a hardened heart does not mean he decided in advance Pharaoh is an
object of his wrath. He said he raised him up that way so God’s power and might
could be shown to the world. Who is to
say that Pharaoh was not later shown mercy? Certainly it seems the very people God
showed his mercy to by delivering them out of the hands of Pharaoh, became
objects of wrath by their refusal to accept his mercy in Christ Jesus, and
those who were once objects of wrath, the gentiles, like Pharaoh, became
objects of his mercy through faith. It all boils down to the fact that we are
saved by faith, not by works. A person is either in or out and it is by the
choice of that person. It’s man’s choice to live under the what if or the what
then.
No comments:
Post a Comment