DEVOTION
THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO MARK
THE SIGHTFUL FOLLOWER
Mark 10:46-52
46 Then they came to Jericho. As Jesus and his disciples, together with
a large crowd, were leaving the city, a blind man, Bartimaeus (that is, the Son
of Timaeus), was sitting by the roadside begging. 47 When he heard that it was
Jesus of Nazareth, he began to shout, "Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on
me!" 48 Many rebuked him and told him to be quiet, but he shouted all the
more, "Son of David, have mercy on me!" 49 Jesus stopped and said, "Call him." So they called to the blind man,
"Cheer up! On your feet! He's calling you." 50 Throwing his cloak
aside, he jumped to his feet and came to Jesus. 51 "What
do you want me to do for you?" Jesus asked him. The blind man said,
"Rabbi, I want to see." 52 "Go," said
Jesus, "your faith has healed you." Immediately
he received his sight and followed Jesus along the road.
NIV
This is the last of the healings we see that Mark records before Jesus
enters Jerusalem for what we call the Passion Week. There is something
interesting here in that Mark gives us the name of the person being healed. This
may be the first time we have ever heard a person’s name who needed healing,
and Mark uses it twice in a sense. First, he gives us his name as Bartimaeus and
then as the Son of Timaeus. The fact
that his name begins with Bar, which is the word for son, and the rest of his
name is the same as his father's. This may well simply mean it is a family name
and nothing else. Yet why does Mark give us this blind man’s name when he has
never given any other name of people who were healed, including blind men.
There is also something interesting in that Bartimaeus called out to Jesus, Son
of David. What else is interesting is that because this is the only time Mark
gives us a name, and he also uses this parenthetical explanatory translation,
as he has in the past. So then it would read, Son of Timaeus, (that is Son of
Timaeus). Our scholars suggest that perhaps the reason Mark gives this name is
due to the great literary dialogue of Plato where Timaeus is the narrator. We
are told by our scholars that Plato in his work of Timaeus and elsewhere he
famously contrasts the “seeing” the mere physical world while being “blind” to
eternal truths. Could Mark have read this important work and uses this as a
lesson for that same idea because of giving us this man’s name as the same in
Plato’s work? Only a learned scholar might take the time to research and come
up with a possibly plausible interpretation. The average reader would never
find this concept, which we are, and thus our scholars may be making more of it
than it should be. Yet, it is interesting to ponder. However, there is another
translation of this fellow’s name which can be rendered as unclean. He is an
unclean blind beggar who gives Jesus honor, by calling him Jesus, Son of David.
This honors Jesus as Matthew does in his genealogy. He starts right out by saying this a record of the genealogy of Jesus Christ the son of David, the son
of Abraham. Jesus is greater than David and Abraham and this Bartimaeus calls
him the Son of David. But what is of interest for our lives are the two
truths we can apply. First, when Jesus says to call him and he threw off his
cloak and came, Jesus asked him what he wanted him to do for him. Well, actually
there are three truths we can apply. The first being when this man was called
to come to Jesus, he threw aside his cloak. Are we not to throw aside that
which we were clothed with in our spiritual blindness? Second, are we not told
to ask for that which we need? Although Jesus already knew Bartimaeus wanted to
see, he asked him what he wanted Jesus to do for him. Jesus wanted him to ask
to be healed, to ask for his sight. Then there is this possibility that Mark is
again showing the difference between spiritual blindness and that once we meet
Jesus we can see. However, the third truth we can apply has more to do with
what happens with Bartimaeus. Jesus tells him to Go, that his faith has healed
him. Well, actually there are fourth truths we can apply. The third being the
need for faith to be healed. Doubt destroys faith, doubt hinders faith’s
work. The simple faith of a child, as Jesus has pointed out to us before brings
healing as we come to him and ask. What we see in the physical, or feel in the
physical can hamper real faith. Although Bartimaeus knew his eyes could not
see, he believed Jesus could make him see. The fourth truth is that the Son of
Timaeus did not go, but he followed Jesus, and we would have to believe, he
followed him all the way up to Jerusalem, and that he was not quiet about his
being able to see. Instead of thinking of him as blind Bartimaeus, we should
think of him as Bartimaeus the sightful follower of Jesus.
No comments:
Post a Comment