Boy oh boy, was the debate ever a great one, Sarah Palin was absolutely wonderful, delightful to watch her electrify personality compared to that ho-hum boring Joe what's his name. It was such an abuse of his one lie a day average, I think he used up a whole months worth. Now saying that, I know Sarah Palin stretched a few numbers as well, but overall she was great. What a command of topics and thoughtful comments. I really believe she has what it takes, "say it ain't so Joe". My only hope and prayer is that many Americans can see clearly that the liberal ticket running against John and Sarah are so dangerous for this country. I do not believe this country could withstand the huge tax burden this pair of number 1 and number 3 most liberal senators would put on the middle class people of this great land. They would saddle the working class with more and more taxes only to gain more control over those who look to big government for their sole care. I cannot understand how they claim they will not tax 95% of Americans when only 70% of Americans pay taxes to start with. There are 30% of Americans who do not pay any federal income tax. This is due to either having an income below that tax base, or like myself are self employed and many after declaring all the legal deductions have a net profit which produces an income below the federal income tax base. Now those people, like me still have to pay self employment taxes, but many may not pay income tax. so how do you not tax 95% when only 70% pay in the first place. That is very poor math, even for a lawyer, but not for a senator.
Now I also need to say, I was wrong about Gwen Ifill, I do think she did an outstanding job of being fair and balanced in her questions of both Sarah Palin and Joe what's his name.
1 comment:
I agree about the moderator. I was pleasantly surprised that she kept it really fair and unbiased actually... good for her.
Post a Comment